the government has a hard time next waiting why the government needs to do this and what interest is served by penalizing married couples the proposition any case it is a much more dicey proposition. the case goes up in its current form, and there are ways they could narrow it, it basically is must the 44 states that don't have same-sex marriage start allowing them? that would be politically incendiary. imagine telling of mississippi and alabama and texas, oh, by the way, you have to start performing same-sex marriages or you are in violation of the constitution. i think they will deny tertiary on this case, which would mean same-sex her to come to california. that would mean approximately 20 to 25% of the people in the country will live in states that have same-sex marriage. i don't think that there is anyone who believes that that number is going to start to shrink rather than grow. you know, i am not particularly knowledgeable about pennsylvania state of the debate here, but i assume, it's not going to happen anytime soon. but, you know, illinois, it's a big issue, i think the cou